Thread · saved · Apr 25

ApoB targets and the new JAMA paper

Is the new ApoB study from JAMA legit?
Whalespan · consensus-weighted · 3 sources

Solid methodology, modest novelty.

The 2026 JAMA paper is a 24,000-person cohort comparing ApoB to LDL-C as predictors of incident MI. It replicates what Sniderman has been arguing since 2019: ApoB tracks risk slightly better than LDL-C, particularly in patients with discordant lipids (high triglycerides, normal LDL). The methodology is solid — pre-registered, multi-site, properly adjusted.

The novelty is more about scale than direction. P. Arenwald summarized it as 'confirmation, not revelation' — useful for shifting clinical practice but not a paradigm change. For a typical patient: if your LDL and ApoB agree, this paper changes nothing for you. If they disagree, ApoB is the more reliable target.

Sources
[1]
JAMA 2026 — ApoB-particle count vs. LDL-C in primary prevention
JAMA 2026 · cohort n=24,118
[2]
Sniderman — ApoB review
JACC 2019 · review
[3]
P. Arenwald — Drive 221 transcript
Podcast 2025-02
Follow-ups