The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but once you start to get into the high volume drinkers uh these are people that are drinking three to four drinks per day and then the highest volume drinkers are over four drinks per day these people start to see an uptick in their all cause mortality at 20 and 35% uh uh respectively relative to the uh people who abstain
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now interestingly when you look at um you know the occasional the low volume and the medium volume drinkers they actually didn't have an increase in all cause mortality