The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we use something called the timeline followback method because it tends to be more reliable than a sort of General Gestalt where we say okay how much did you drink yesterday how much did you drink the day before that and the day before that and the day before that until we get seven days
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we use something called the timeline followback method because it tends to be more reliable than a sort of General Gestalt where we say okay how much did you drink yesterday how much did you drink the day before that and the day before that and the day before that until we get seven days