Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
you've seen Collins in 2011 or so came out with a paper that basically said one to two drinks a day in men and one drink a day and women is probably protective then you have all these new UK studies that show actually if you do 0 that's better so there's the data is a little bit all over the place
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
then you have all these new UK studies that show actually if you do 0 that's better so there's the data is a little bit all over the place