The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the real paradox of doing this this really in-depth multi-criteria decision analysis is it turns out that the drugs that have been most vilified and and which we've been taught are the most dangerous turn out to be the least dangerous so so at one end of the the most harmful drug is the alcohol one of the least harmful drugs the magic mushrooms in lsd and mdma so there's it's almost as if the the whole law is completely on its head
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.