The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so if there's evidence of injury um an injury so the way that we liver doctors think about it our markers of necroinflammation as and as LT are not functional they're markers of of injury and we think of much more U meaningful things in terms of being functional albumin synthetic function in terms of coagulation and then also glucose handling
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and we think of much more U meaningful things in terms of being functional albumin synthetic function in terms of coagulation and then also glucose handling
so the way that we liver doctor think about it our markers of necroinflammation a and ALT are not functional they're markers of of injury