Peter Attia· MD
our evaluation was that that the harms of alcohol is considerably greater than the harms of tobacco
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
our evaluation was that that the harms of alcohol is considerably greater than the harms of tobacco
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
tobacco came out at about number six or seventh and the tobacco anti-tobacco got really agitated they say it is the most harmful drug because it kills more people and we said yeah but that's right it kills more people but they often die in their 50s and 60s alcohol is killing people in their 20s and that's more important we think our evaluation was that that the harms of alcohol is considerably greater than the harms of tobacco
yeah but that's right it kills more people but they often die in their 50s and 60s alcohol is killing people in their 20s and that's more important we think our evaluation was that that the harms of alcohol is considerably greater than the harms of tobacco