The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and the largest one uh that that I've seen is the recent one that came out in jamama last year it included 1007 cohort studies and nearly 5 million lives were studied and it compared a bunch of different entities to lifelong abstainers
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
people who abstain from alcohol for a reason which is often where people are abstaining from alcohol they're either former drinkers um or uh they have health reasons that prevent them from drinking it there's often this paradoxical increase in mortality that we see
You have people in the never drinking category who are never drinking for health reasons and things like that. And if you strip those people out that that that little uh J curve goes away.