The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so would there be any efficacy to a trial there in either an individual with MCI mild cognitive impairment or as crazy as this sounds is there a reason to consider it prophylactically in high-risisk individuals with the caveat that hey by the way if you happen to get an infection like this would be a good time to stop it and ride it out and get better
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so would there be any efficacy to a trial there in either an individual with MCI mild cognitive impairment or as crazy as this sounds is there a reason to consider it prophylactically in high-risisk individuals with the caveat that hey by the way if you happen to get an infection like this would be a good time to stop it and ride it out and get better