The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
people with high cognitive reserve high cognitive backup systems are resistant to the effects of the amyloid but there's a time that comes when they decline and those people decline much more sharply than others because they had like this emergency backup system but sometimes when the parachute fails the person goes down
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
well someone that has Alzheimer's and is very cognitively engaged and has a good backup pathway they're not gonna decline as quickly
so people with high cognitive reserve high cognitive backup systems are resistant to the effects of the amyloid but there's a time that comes when they decline and those people decline much more sharply than others because they had like this emergency backup system but sometimes when the parachute fails the person goes down
people with high cognitive reserve high cognitive backup systems are resistant to the effects of the amyloid but there's a time that comes when they decline and those people decline much more sharply than others because they had like this emergency backup system