Rhonda Patrick· PhD
it does sort of point out the idea that you know um right that there may be a contribution of things either over time or a number of different risk factors that that can certainly contribute to this right
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it does sort of point out the idea that you know um right that there may be a contribution of things either over time or a number of different risk factors that that can certainly contribute to this right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.