The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
we also know these things naturally accumulate over time and you can have people you know there are multiple cases where they've looked to the Pathology where you have significant — a burden of these neuropathological Hallmarks with no decrease in cognitive function and so I think there's or or beyond what might be expected given that person's age
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
pretty much anybody who dies with Dementia or experiences dementia will have some burden of amyloid plaque and and Tau Tangles
For a long time, I was like, "It's the plaques, kind of like, plaques, it's this, it's that." And it turns out to be more complicated than that because you have people who have massive tangles of plaques but they seem asymptomatic.