We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
if you applied the c2n test willy-nilly across everybody my fear is you would probably get a lot of noise and you would I mean I don't this isn't an arbitrary fear it's just mathematics you're going to get a lower positive predictive value the test will mean less and you'll you'll get lower negative predictive value as well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.