The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
It seems much harder to make the case for cancer in fact when you think about some of the things that are such obvious problems with respect to dementia for example disrupted sleep poor exercise Etc clear relationship very hard at least for me to make the case that bad sleep is related to cancer although I think it is right but I don't the data aren't clear
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
while I think both of us are and and I think there are others who share this point of view completely convinced uh and in fact I I just don't see how how one could not be at this point convinced of the benefit that exercise poses to the brain it seems much harder to make the case for cancer in fact when you think about some of the things that are such obvious problems with respect to dementia for example disrupted sleep poor exercise Etc clear relationship very hard at least for me to make the case that bad sleep is related to cancer although I think it is but but I I don't the data aren't clear right