The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you know people get periodontal disease when they get older in much the same way that people get alzheimer's disease or heart disease if you look at the risk profile as a function of age it looks strikingly similar to these other age-related diseases you know what do you think maybe the biology of aging is contributing and you know in hindsight it's like oh yeah that makes a lot of sense but i had never thought about that before
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.