The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so when when you have we talked about the how a pony for might increase the risk of Alzheimer's disease and that certainly seems to be the case I think that's what most people are worried about and it does you know it may increase the risk or you know may increase the the increase in cholesterol that we see and people to eat particularly saturated fat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
increasing levels of cholesterol were associated with increasing risk of alzheimer's disease in individuals without the apoe4 allele but not in those with the apoe4 allele