The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you know again we think about kind of the longevity of the eye is a pretty important thing right if you want to figure out a way to live to a hundred you we we spend a lot of time thinking about well you've got to really really delay the onset of atherosclerosis you have to have a very aggressive strategy around the mitigation of cancer alzheimer's disease and all these things but it's these other things teeth ears and eyes that i don't think get enough attention right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.