The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when the last time i looked at the distribution of death for centenarians it was shockingly similar to that of non-centenarians with a couple of differences they tended to have a little more atherosclerosis a little more heart attacks a little less alzheimer's disease and i think a little bit more pneumonia but directionally they had the same actuarial table of death as people dying in their 80s it was just a time shift
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.