The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i really think this is easily the most exciting thing ever for maintaining cognition preventing alzheimer's disease and it still needs to be flushed out but there's some very good biological plausibility behind it and some fascinating animal data human data and even some some small randomized trials
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
one of the things on that list is indeed theracumin for exactly the reasons you've stated