The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but you know it is this sort of cascade of damage there is activation of glial cells which sort of help protect our brain against you know intruders and they can release toxins they can sort of eat you know it's called autophagy you know eating up our own tissue and so there's damage both inside the neurons and then outside you know plaques and tangles and it creates a cascade that eventually leads to cell death
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but you know it is this sort of cascade of damage there is activation of glial cells which sort of help protect our brain against you know intruders and they can release toxins they can sort of eat you know it's called autophagy you know eating up our own tissue um and so there's damage both inside the neurons and then outside you know plaques and tangles and it creates a cascade that eventually leads to cell death
I think they're more responsible for the damage you know i think that they're part of the cascade that leads to the death of the neurons because they're trying to protect you know the neurons and in doing so injure them