Peter Attia· MD
the correlation between the pet and their these were people who were kind enough to donate their brains after they passed to compare to what their pet scan looked like and it was a correlation was about 97
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the correlation between the pet and their these were people who were kind enough to donate their brains after they passed to compare to what their pet scan looked like and it was a correlation was about 97
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.