The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
is it science fiction to imagine that there will be a day when an AI could listen to a person's voice watch the movements of their eyes study the movements or of their gate and predict 20 years in advance when a person is staring down the barrel of a neurodegenerative disease and act at a time when maybe we could actually reverse it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now we have these artificial intelligence models that's based on hundreds of variables can predict various other diseases and it will do Alzheimer's I believe um very soon I think you'll be able to see a combination of gate speech patterns um picture of your body picture of skin and eye movements like you said will be a very accurate ictor
um maybe on a good day we can halt progression really really early in a patient with just a whiff of MCI mild cognitive impairment um maybe with an early ameloid detection and an anti-ameloid drug but do you I mean is it science fiction to imagine that there will be a day when an AI could listen to a person's voice watch the movements of their eyes study the movements or of their gate and predict 20 years in advance when a person is staring down the barrel of a neurodegenerative disease and act at a time when maybe we could actually reverse it I mean how science fictiony is that I don't believe it's science fiction at all