The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And actually, we've had a number of people who have tried to remove their amyloid with antibodies who've actually gotten worse with that happening. So you have to go back to, why is there? And it's tough because yes, it is both part of the mediator, it's not the cause of Alzheimer's, it's a mediator, and I think that's been one of the problems.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.