The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I do the same thing with LP little a actually in the cardiovascular front which is very helpful right it's to be able to say let's track where this disease is coming from and see how much of it we can attribute to the genetic influence
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
not all e4s are created equal i don't think that can be overstated enough and the the analogy for in the cardiovascular world is lp little a