The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's sort of the counterweight to every thing we talked about before so the idea that you know multiple things genetic risk factors environmental risk factors um and disuse if if you will of lifestyle factors kind of contribute to brain injury brain changes over time so sort of an insult if you will to the brain that bring out diseases parkinson's is an example of that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
one of the probably most compelling lifestyle factors that at least from my reading and certainly from research like yours that seems to impact parkinson's disease in a positive way meaning decreased risk and also seems to be associated with um you know modulating the severity of the disease is exercise