The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Again, I think the etiology of Alzheimer's is complex, and there is probably a metabolic phenotype that Dr. Bredesen talks about like in his book. And I think that phenotype would be very responsive to the ketogenic diet where, I don't know, you would potentially screen for these patients by doing an FTG-PET scan. And if you see, you know, there's like brain atrophy, but if you see a dim PET scan, then a metabolic intervention may be a good, you know, approach for that.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.