The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And in animal studies, there are some genetic models that are actually pretty good for autism. There's something called Fragile X syndrome. And the gene is known for that. And when that gene abnormality is put in mice, and then you put the mouse in a cage which a bunch of other mice, the mouse goes in the corner and doesn't want to interact with other mice, and kind of measure this propensity to interact, so kind of social withdrawal.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.