The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think prevention ultimately is going to be the way to go as far as disease modification and you know just like you'll go to the doctor and see you have high cholesterol and intervene then before you get to these you know bad cardiac or stroke outcomes you know you'll go to the doctor and perhaps have a test that shows you have amyloid and then intervene then so that you don't then develop cognitive impairment that's our hope and our goal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if we're looking at a cure because that's what everybody wants right a cure i think the prevention trials are really going to be the way to go because then you're stopping it before it starts
in terms of sort of the ideal i think prevention ultimately is going to be the way to go as far as disease modification and you know just like you'll go to the doctor and see you have high cholesterol and intervene then before you get to these you know bad cardiac or stroke outcomes you know you'll go to the doctor and perhaps have a test that shows you have amyloid and then intervene then so that you don't then develop cognitive impairment that's our hope and our goal