The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
even if that's the case all you've done is you've moved the amyloid from outside the cell to inside the cell where it first accumulates that doesn't then stop it you know causing damage being a primary causative Factor because you know once that either the first and you're on itself and then the structures around it could still be could still be uh damaged
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.