The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's not completely clear whether they get what would be clinically diagnosed as Alzheimer's disease and people apparently they do accumulate a beta in the brain whether it they get the plaques and tangles still seems to be a little bit up in the air and there are people studying that but at least at the level of cognitive dysfunction and dementia it's clear that dogs experience that with age as well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.