We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
there are a lot of Physicians who would say look no one should know that there's nothing that can be done about it why would you burden somebody with that knowledge yeah and people like me and Richard isacson Kelly and neas you know people I work with I mean we fundamentally disagree with that Chris we we think that is complete nonsense and we think that this is absolutely a condition through which uh you have an enormous um lever arm to mitigate risk
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I found that to be a baseless and merit-less criticism truthfully