The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
No, I mean, the amyloids form in lots of tissues in our body. There's very specific diseases associated with that. But I think what we're seeing is that this amyloid formations is a more general aging process. It's just going on probably in most of our tissues, if not all, and maybe then drives disease pathology that becomes obvious to us when we look at it as a disease.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.