The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
their superpower is simply delaying the onset of bad things like bad things just happened to them 20 to 25 years later so it's not that they don't get heart attacks they just don't get them when they're 65 it's not that they don't get cancer they just don't get it when they're 60 it's not that they don't even get dementia they just don't get it when they're 75
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.