The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And again, it tends to be the poor who don't know and they're just eating carbohydrate and it may be comfort food, but it's aging them much faster. And every possible disease that's been looked at is higher in the obese. More cancer, more brain decay, more heart disease, you name it. And if it's been looked at, it's higher in the obese. And I think it a lot of that's due to the fact that they're starving for vitamins and minerals.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.