Peter Attia· MD
so if you wanted to target the system you would not target you would not target the creation of amyloid you would probably target the enzymes that abnormally cleave well that that is one area that has been studied
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so if you wanted to target the system you would not target you would not target the creation of amyloid you would probably target the enzymes that abnormally cleave well that that is one area that has been studied
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
yeah i mean those could be pulled out without consequence because they shouldn't be there in the first place