Paul Saladino· MD
then we started to focus more on Tau which may be a better predictor
Verbal pushback — no audited source on record.
74
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
then we started to focus more on Tau which may be a better predictor
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I actually probably think Tao is if you look at the data I think the data are better on them in terms of predicting cognitive decline at least then amyloid is