The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, initially, what we saw was that many people had this type 1.5, glycotoxicity is so common. In fact, again, Professor Getzel from UCSF had a nice paper a few years ago showing that everyone he evaluated using exosomal analysis had the signature of insulin resistance in the nervous system, whether they had it peripherally or not.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.