The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you do a population attributable risk or population attributable attributable fraction you say if we remove this entirely What proportion of that disease would disappear and we have a mounting — sort of poverty of evidence that says that these risk factors interact so when you do a population attributable risk you say this is a linear effect it's additive right this on top of this on top of this but in reality we know that yeah very creative they're actually interactive
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.