The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what it is about the deposition of these plaques the accumulation of the tau why does it lead to this largely predictable set of symptoms that don't just involve almost a folksy funny loss of memory right but also at some of this deeper level of this what i suspect is fear and confusion on on some level right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so there's um actually a couple who i believe were both pathologists um brock and brock b-r-a-a-k and what they did was they kind of came up with the brock staging of of pathology where the amyloid protein and then the pathology of alzheimer's spreads over different parts of the brain and you know when i was in medical school i was taught that alzheimer's disease is a progressive neurological disease characterized by changes in short-term memory and then later on that includes changes in some behaviors neuropsychiatric disease changes in sleep and then the person as the pathology spreads they can no longer take care of themselves