Peter Attia· MD
but with apoe because you have these three discrete isoforms you only have six combinations and therefore if you know what the parents isoforms are you can probabilistically give a distribution for what the children will be
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but with apoe because you have these three discrete isoforms you only have six combinations and therefore if you know what the parents isoforms are you can probabilistically give a distribution for what the children will be
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but with apoe because you have these three discrete isoforms you only have six combinations and therefore if you know what the parents isoforms are you can probabilistically give a distribution for what the children will be