The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in the literature when you are are interested in studying the relationship between strength and outcomes everything from onset of dementia all cause mortality cardiovascular disease all of these things which has been studied you need objective measurements of strength to test if your hypothesis is strength is positively associated with correlates with or even causal towards these things you have to be able to test it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.