The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
and then the two threes get a benefit not as much as the two twos looks like it's about 11 10 to 15% yeah I really like two threes two threes I can really sink my teeth into and but you must not see many of these people no no I see two threes all the time why they still have risk they're still coming to you because of family history oh yeah but there's a different gene there's a different gene and that lurking in there but then we don't know what it is yet
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we think of the 3 3 as the Baseline since that's the that's the you know most common genotype we see in the population
you did not have a copy of the four gene so you might be a 33 which by the way most of you probably are 60% of the population is a 33 that's the good news
you might be a 33 which by the way most of you probably are 60% of the population is a 33