We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
you know looking at physical activity body composition diet quality smoking hearing loss which I I think of as a cognitive demand which is lost educational status and my guess is that this is actually an underestimate — because they didn't include sleep they didn't include nutrient status particularly homocysteine status which other individuals have suggested has a population attributable risk of around 20 — for late onset Alzheimer's disease
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.