The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
historically and for the purposes of research these were typically drawn from uh CSF so cerebral spinal fluid which can be accessed via a lumbar puncture uh would certainly be a way to determine the presence of amyloid and Tau again a very impractical in the real world right these are not benign procedures and they're certainly not things that we want to subject patients to rapidly
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.