Peter Attia· MD
women plus a po e plus 65 and over much higher likelihood of amyloid
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
women plus a po e plus 65 and over much higher likelihood of amyloid
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so eight Bowie plus age higher likelihood of amyloid then you add in gender women plus a po e plus 65 and over much higher likelihood of amyloid so again it's a poly not just a polygenic but a poly risk whatever it increases the likelihood of amyloid deposition