The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
now during physiological states the glucose in the brain is relatively not does not fluctuate that much although it does fluctuate but it doesn't fluctuate as much as that in plasma during disease states such as alzheimer's for example leakage or destruction of the blood-brain barrier associates with destruction in the glut1 transporters and the brain now struggles in capturing glucose from the system which leads to a whole new cascade that we might argue is a diseased cascade
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the brain has glute ones as opposed to glute fours and glute ones are insulin independent is that correct