Paul Saladino· MD
and then if you have two copies is maybe like five times that so 10 to 20% something like that
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
and then if you have two copies is maybe like five times that so 10 to 20% something like that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and then two fours apoe4 fours increases risk more so
you typically see in the report some discussion that they are at an increased risk of alzheimer's disease
the 3-4 seems to be associated with about a two to three-fold risk in alzheimer's disease
if you have E4 E4 your risk for Alzheimer is 16 times higher than when you have E3 E3 and if you have E3 4 your risk is about four and a half times higher
A 4/4 of course, is anywhere from 10x to 20x depending on the series.