Peter Attia· MD
if you can delay Alzheimer's by two five or seven or ten years by doing everything right in that subset they're going to probably die from something else
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you can delay Alzheimer's by two five or seven or ten years by doing everything right in that subset they're going to probably die from something else
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
instead of getting it at 69 we can make it 78 well a lot can happen in nine years it's not just that you could die of something else which is maybe better maybe not depending on what that something else is but more importantly maybe you and your peers have nine extra years to come up with something else