Peter Attia· MD
probably about half yeah so in other words there is a difference between the muscle you gained versus the muscle you never had
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
probably about half yeah so in other words there is a difference between the muscle you gained versus the muscle you never had
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you got to 180 on steroids and then you quit all the steroids and now you're back down to 170 you could walk around and maintain that 170 on a normal secretion of testosterone or normal trt you would have never been able to do that without the steroid so it's a permanent Advantage
huge huge variation but for me steroids did a lot but nothing crazy it a I didn't gain 70 lbs of muscle but I gained yeah 30ish something like that over 13 years been a while