The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one of the things that it does is it causes an epigenetic change in the amygdala so is that rat gonna be born with a larger amygdala or is the phenotype more complicated in just size its size and a bunch of other things as an adult it's going to have a bigger amygdala and it's going to be more excitable and it's going to be more prone towards interpreting a neutral situation there's a threatening one
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.